FTA Forum articles
Fact Finders are called in to
Arbitrate FTA Contract Dispute

Shame on Administration for failing to negotiate in good faith!

The cold winter night or pre-holiday preparations did not affect the significant teacher turn out on December 18 th , as the double and triple line of FTA faculty marched carrying informational posters . The line extended nearly the length of the block in front of the Atkinson school. Many teachers carried small lights representing the hope that the district would focus on and resolve the issues at stake. A few teachers, accompanied by their children, felt that Freeport administrators, the school board and the community should realize how important it was to forge ahead and come to an equitable solution to contract negotiations which had begun in the spring, even prior to the expiration date of the contract.

Teachers coming into the building to observe the scheduled Board Meeting stood silently watching while board members appeared to obsess with the minutiae of parliamentary procedure “If only they were as determined to work on contract issues” sighed one of the teachers.”

Prior and during the negotiations meeting, angry and disappointed teachers demonstrated outside the administration building. They carried signs demanding a fair resolution for a contract. In addition, teachers sang Christmas carol parodies requesting that wages, working conditions and professional issues be addressed in an equitable manner. Freeport teachers are working under the NY State Taylor law which maintains previously expired contracts. The current contract ended in July 2002.

However, at the Wednesday, December 18, 2002 negotiations meeting, the Freeport Teachers Association realized that contract negotiations were not progressing. They requested that Fact Finding be initiated. This step calls for state intervention through a PERB appointed Fact Finder whose job it is to sift through the issues in order to affect resolution. As part of the process, hard data referring to the school budget and other statistical information will be analyzed with fiscal priorities evaluated and adjusted. Recommendations will be made; however, they are not binding. Barry Peek, the FTA attorney, addressing the Delegate Assembly on January 9 th said that “for the most part, recommendations are upheld by both organizations as both parties are interested in settling, and moving along to finally resolve the negotiation process.

Although not binding, fact finding decisions are often the basis of the final decisions. The PERB appointed Fact Finder will most likely meet in late winter. All negotiable areas (Wages, Working Conditions and Professional Issues) are put back on the table and re-evaluated. The Fact Finder will make public recommendations and, in February/March, after two days of hearings, each side will be given three weeks to present their briefs. Recommendations must be made in 30 days.

Peek, reflecting on the negotiations, acknowledged that school boards often stretch out the negotiation process in the hope that membership will lose their focus, tire and change some of their demands. However, most contracts upon final negotiation become retroactive to cover the time period between settlement and when the former contract expired. He went on to say that “The FTA has a learned, articulate negotiation team, which is very positive.” The FTA action committees are an important part of the process and it is very important that the membership back the FTA leadership in all initiatives dealing with contract resolution.


It was pointed out that on three separate occasions, the FTA negotiations team was prepared to engage in marathon bargaining sessions while the Board did not appear to be interested in thrashing out solutions and terminated meetings earlier than expected. The board was not ready to come to closure. Another delegate questioned the meaning of “working to the contract.” Peek said that there was a very thin line between what could be considered a “job action” or upholding and maintaining the contract. Penalties, for overstepping the boundaries are very severe and therefore, should be explored with great caution. Getting community support for negotiation could be a very powerful tool. Also, it is very important for FTA membership to speak to community activists and leaders such as PTA, Chamber of Commerce representatives to enlist their support for a fair and equitable settlement of differences.

A Freeport teacher who happens to be a long time resident of the community said, “It was too bad that a lot of time had gone into the effort of trying to resolve a fair contract….and now, more time, energy, as well as money will be involved. Another teacher commented that “Administrative and teacher efforts would be better put to use in effectively meeting state standards on upcoming assessments.”

Respectfully
Submitted ,

Mireille Taub